public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>, root <r6144@263.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle
Date: 09 Dec 2001 19:30:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1007944229.878.21.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011209184656.E8846@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <75F30A52-ECF4-11D5-80FE-00039355CFA6@suespammers.org> <1007939114.878.1.camel@phantasy> <20011209181643.A8846@redhat.com> <1007940066.878.7.camel@phantasy>  <20011209184656.E8846@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 18:46, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> Actually, yes: in entry.S the ret_from_syscall path which calls schedule 
> can be changed to pass a parameter indicating it is returning to userspace 
> afterwards which would let schedule know the bump is not needed.

Hmm, what if we only boosted it based on something like this:

	if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE) {
		weight = p->counter;
		if (p->lock_depth >= 0 || signal_pending(p))
			/* boost somehow ... */
	}

(I'm writing the patch now :>)

Would it still make sense to only boost it in kernel space ?

	Robert Love


  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-10  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-08  4:38 [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle root
2001-12-08  4:39 ` Robert Love
2001-12-09 22:31   ` Anthony DeRobertis
2001-12-09 23:05     ` Robert Love
2001-12-09 23:16       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-12-09 23:21         ` Robert Love
2001-12-09 23:46           ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-12-10  0:30             ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-12-10  2:46               ` Rik van Riel
2001-12-10 12:25                 ` Niteshadow
2001-12-11  1:35               ` Steve Bergman
2001-12-19 23:49           ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-11  1:36       ` Ton Hospel
2001-12-11  1:54         ` Robert Love
2001-12-13 21:42           ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1007944229.878.21.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=asd@suespammers.org \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r6144@263.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox