From: Jason Baietto <jason@baietto.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces
Date: 10 Dec 2001 20:59:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1008035965.11626.3.camel@tofu> (raw)
Some people have asked me for more information before they'll attempt
to download and play with this stuff, so here's the --help output from
the latest version of the run(1) command:
Usage: run [OPTIONS] { COMMAND [ARGS] | PROCESS_SPECIFIER }
Set scheduling parameters and CPU bias for a new process or a list
of existing processes.
OPTIONS can be one or more of the following options:
-b, --bias=LIST Set the CPU bias to the LIST of CPUs;
CPUs are numbered starting from 0
-s, --policy=POLICY Set the scheduling policy to POLICY
-P, --priority=LEVEL Set the scheduling priority to LEVEL
-q, --quantum=QUANTUM Set the SCHED_RR quantum to QUANTUM
-v, --version Output version information and exit
-h, --help Display this help and exit
PROCESS_SPECIFIER is exactly one of the following options:
-p, --pid=LIST Specify LIST of existing PIDs to modify
-g, --group=LIST Specify LIST of process groups to modify; all
existing processes in the groups will be modified
-u, --user=LIST Specify LIST of users to modify; all existing
processes owned by the users will be modified
-n, --name=LIST Specify LIST of existing process names to modify
Multiple comma separated values can be specified for all LISTs and ranges
are allowed where appropriate (e.g. "run -b 0,1-3 autopilot").
See the run(1) man page for more information.
Take care,
Jason
> Hello All,
>
> I'm currently working on adding multiprocessor control interfaces
> to Linux. My current efforts can be found here:
>
> http://www.ccur.com/realtime/oss
>
> These are clean-room implementations of similar tools that have
> been available in our proprietary *nix for quite some time, and
> so the interfaces have a fair amount of mileage under their belts.
> Note that the scope is somewhat wider than just MP.
>
> There has been some discussion of "chaff" and other interfaces
> recently on this list, so in an effort to hopefully move towards
> a standard more quickly I've gotten permission from my employer
> to GPL the code I've written. I'm very interested in comments
> and feedback on any or all of this work.
>
> Here's the README file from the package:
>
>
> This package contains:
>
> run(1)
> A multiprocessor control command line tool.
>
> mpadvise(3)
> A multiprocessor control library interface.
>
> These services rely upon Robert Love's CPU Affinity patch
> (version 2.4.16-1 was used for testing) which is available here:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity/v2.4/
>
> To build the code, simply unpack it and type "make". The code has
> been tested on Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 systems, though it is still
> fairly new and almost certainly contains bugs.
>
> An attempt was made to abstract the "cpuset" representation of
> the current system in order to have binaries that in theory
> could work on systems with more than 32 cpus. For this to work,
> the run(1) command would need to be linked against a shared
> mpadvise(3) library (currently only a static library is made).
>
> This code is being released in the hopes that it will become
> the basis for the Linux multiprocessor control standard interfaces.
> I am very interested in getting feedback on this package,
> so please contact me via email or LKML if you have any.
>
> This source code is licensed under the GNU GPL Version 2.
> Copyright (C) 2001 Concurrent Computer Corporation
>
> --
> Jason Baietto
> jason.baietto@ccur.com
> http://www.ccur.com/realtime/oss
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-11 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-11 1:59 Jason Baietto [this message]
2001-12-11 1:38 ` [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces Tim Hockin
2001-12-11 16:31 ` Jason Baietto
2001-12-11 18:16 ` Tim Hockin
2001-12-12 15:11 ` Jason Baietto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-10 20:14 Jason Baietto
2001-12-11 6:29 ` Robert Love
2001-12-11 16:18 ` Jason Baietto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1008035965.11626.3.camel@tofu \
--to=jason@baietto.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox