From: Edward Muller <emuller@learningpatterns.com>
To: Diego Calleja <grundig@teleline.es>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1!
Date: 19 Dec 2001 11:56:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1008780992.8835.2.camel@akira.learningpatterns.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011217024529.E418@diego>
In-Reply-To: <20011217002350.D418@diego> <20011217024529.E418@diego>
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 20:45, Diego Calleja wrote:
[snip]
> As you said, i've tested the drive:
>
> root@diego:~# badblocks -n -vv /dev/hdc5
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 16:05: rw=0, want=9671068, limit=9671067
> 967106456/ 9671067
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 16:05: rw=0, want=9671068, limit=9671067
> 9671065
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 16:05: rw=0, want=9671068, limit=9671067
> 9671066
> done
> Pass completed, 3 bad blocks found.
[snip]
>From an earlier email...
Well, I've run badblocks in 2.4.16
results:
root@diego:~# badblocks -n -vv /dev/hdc5
Initializing random test data
Checking for bad blocks in non-destructive read-write mode
>From block 0 to 9671067
Checking for bad blocks (non-destructive read-write test): done
Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found.
root@diego:~#
So under 2.4.17-rc1 Diego gets the '...access beyond end of device' and
with 2.4.16 he doesn't.
For some reason the badblocks program under 2.4.16 ends at block
9671067, while the 2.4.17-rc1 test tries to go beyond that for some
reason.
Diego, what happens when you run the fsk/try to access /etc/mtab (and
the like) under 2.4.16?
--
-------------------------------
Edward Muller
Director of IS
973-715-0230 (cell)
212-487-9064 x115 (NYC)
http://www.learningpatterns.com
-------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-19 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20011217002350.D418@diego>
2001-12-17 1:45 ` Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1! Diego Calleja
2001-12-19 16:56 ` Edward Muller [this message]
2001-12-19 22:17 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-16 17:48 Diego Calleja
2001-12-16 17:57 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-16 20:12 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-12-17 1:58 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-17 21:01 ` Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <13425.1008580831@nova.botz.org>
2001-12-17 23:33 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-18 5:01 ` Ross Vandegrift
2001-12-18 6:19 ` Jurgen Botz
2001-12-18 21:45 ` Diego Calleja
[not found] ` <20011218125852.A1159@namesys.com>
[not found] ` <20011218224848.C377@diego>
[not found] ` <20011219095303.A11409@namesys.com>
2001-12-20 0:20 ` Diego Calleja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1008780992.8835.2.camel@akira.learningpatterns.com \
--to=emuller@learningpatterns.com \
--cc=grundig@teleline.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox