From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:50:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:50:43 -0500 Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.42]:61657 "EHLO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:50:32 -0500 Subject: Re: replacing strtok() with strsep() From: Philip Harvey To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 27 Dec 2001 21:52:41 +0000 Message-Id: <1009489962.8806.3.camel@arrakis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2001-12-27 at 21:14, Dave Jones wrote: > Someone (I forget who) took a run-through about 6 months back. > AFAIK, they still sit in the last -ac tree, and not all (if any) of them > got merged. If I get bored/desperate for patches to merge, I'll resurrect > them for -dj. There are some other bits I keep meaning to dig out of > Alans old tree, so if you decide to go do this and just bring these in > sync for 2.5, I've no problem putting them in -dj until such a time > for them to get maintainer-review/testing/merging. > > The kernel-janitor list archives should hold copies of some of them. > (See the sf page for details) theres some individual patches for single files dating back a while, but nothing comprehensive. i'll start tieing things together for 2.5, perhaps starting with the fs/ subtree which nobody seems to have touched in a while. it would be nice to declare 2.5 a strtok free zone. most people are using strtok to seperate options, using exactly the same syntax. what are your thoughts on creating a strsep() macro to replace them? -phil