From: jeremy@classic.engr.sgi.com (Jeremy Higdon)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: changes to kiobuf support in 2.4.(?)4
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:55:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10108012254.ZM192062@classic.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
I'm curious about the changes made to kiobuf support, apparently in
order to improve raw I/O performance. I was reading through some old
posts circa early April, where I saw reference to a rawio-bench program.
Can someone explain what it does?
I have a driver that uses kiobufs to perform I/O. Prior to these
changes, the kiobuf allocation and manipulation was very quick and
efficient. It is now very slow.
The kiobuf part of the I/O request is as follows:
alloc_kiovec()
map_user_kiobuf()
... do I/O, using kiobuf to store mappings ...
kiobuf_wait_for_io()
free_kiovec()
Now that the kiobuf is several KB in size, and 1024 buffer heads
are allocated, the alloc_kiovec part goes from a percent or so of
CPU usage to do 13000 requests per second to around 90% CPU usage
to do 3000 per second.
It looks as though the raw driver allocates one kiobuf at open time
(rather than on a per-request basis), but if two or more requests
are issued to a single raw device, it too devolves into the allocate
on every request strategy.
Before I go further, I'd appreciate if someone could confirm my
hypotheses and also explain rawio-bench (and maybe point me to some
source, if available).
thanks
jeremy
next reply other threads:[~2001-08-02 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-02 5:55 Jeremy Higdon [this message]
2001-08-02 6:43 ` changes to kiobuf support in 2.4.(?)4 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-02 7:31 ` Jeremy Higdon
2001-08-02 7:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-02 8:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2001-08-02 8:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-02 8:42 ` Jeremy Higdon
2001-08-02 9:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-02 9:25 ` Jeremy Higdon
2001-08-02 10:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-02 8:23 ` Gerd Knorr
2001-08-03 11:32 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-08-03 12:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10108012254.ZM192062@classic.engr.sgi.com \
--to=jeremy@classic.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox