From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org
Cc: "François Cami" <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr>,
mingo@elte.hu, "Mike Kravetz" <kravetz@us.ibm.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Anton Blanchard" <anton@samba.org>,
"george anzinger" <george@mvista.com>,
"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -G1, 2.5.2-pre10, 2.4.17 (fwd)
Date: 12 Jan 2002 15:00:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1010865650.2152.38.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200201121630.g0CGU5Sr006966@svr3.applink.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201110142160.12174-100000@localhost.localdomain> <200201112150.g0BLoESr004177@svr3.applink.net> <1010814327.2018.5.camel@phantasy> <200201121630.g0CGU5Sr006966@svr3.applink.net>
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 11:26, Timothy Covell wrote:
> That's the million dollar question. I was just concerned that if that
> were to be implemented in a production kernel, then lots of admins
> would be confused.
It is in 2.5. Let's agree if it is or is not a problem, and then find a
solution.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-10 14:19 [patch] O(1) scheduler, -G1, 2.5.2-pre10, 2.4.17 (fwd) Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-10 20:11 ` george anzinger
2002-01-10 23:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 23:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-11 0:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 20:01 ` Robert Love
2002-01-10 23:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 21:57 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-01-11 0:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 23:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-01-11 21:42 ` François Cami
2002-01-11 21:46 ` Timothy Covell
[not found] ` <1010814327.2018.5.camel@phantasy>
2002-01-12 11:48 ` François Cami
2002-01-12 16:26 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-12 20:00 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-01-12 20:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-01-12 20:44 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-12 23:56 ` Robert Love
2002-01-13 6:59 ` Rusty Russell
2002-01-14 8:40 ` Marian Jancar
2002-01-11 21:53 ` Mark Hahn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-13 20:30 Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1010865650.2152.38.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=timothy.covell@ashavan.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox