From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:18:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:18:11 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:47372 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:17:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] add BUG_ON to 2.4 #1 From: Robert Love To: John Levon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020126031732.GA59924@compsoc.man.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1012000446.3799.77.camel@phantasy> <20020126031732.GA59924@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 Date: 25 Jan 2002 22:22:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1012015382.3501.269.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 22:17, John Levon wrote: > I mentioned earlier today we need someone to step up and write a kcompat.h > for 2.5 stuff like minor() and the new remap_page_range(). > > I'll have to do this anyway for the stuff I use (I already have oodles of > 2.2 stuff) but it would be nice to be able to use a "standard" header (and .c > if necessary) Hopefully Marcelo will take this patch and we won't need BUG_ON, at least, for 2.5->2.4 compatibility. Robert Love