From: Reid Hekman <reid.hekman@ndsu.nodak.edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
Date: 06 Feb 2002 01:50:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1012981874.6918.10.camel@zeus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020205235000.J2928@lynx.turbolabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0202051928330.2375-100000@cesium.transmeta.com> <20020205235000.J2928@lynx.turbolabs.com>
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 00:50, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Feb 05, 2002 19:37 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > For a first example, the ChangeLog file for 2.5.4-pre1 is rather more
> > detailed than usual (in fact, right now it is _too_ detailed, and I
> > haven't written the scripts to "terse it down" for postings to
> > linux-kernel, for example).
>
> Well, I for one would rather have these verbose messages than very terse
> messages (or none at all).
I second that. Maybe however we can have it both ways -- I have no
experience with bk, but can't this same info be made available elsewhere
like a public web interface or some such thing?
> Actually, having the full email explanation
> helps other readers just as much as it helps you, and having the subject
> lines helps go back to the specific message/thread in l-k (if the patch
> was also posted there).
If the Changelogs stay verbose on lkml, possibly the list itself would
be more "searchable" -- people hunting specific bugs and kernel versions
would hit the release announcements as kind of an index into the
discussion.
Regards,
Reid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-06 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-06 3:37 linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing Linus Torvalds
2002-02-06 6:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-06 7:50 ` Reid Hekman [this message]
2002-02-06 8:03 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-06 19:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-02-06 19:45 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-06 20:44 ` Wayne Scott
2002-02-06 20:35 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-06 22:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-06 15:17 ` Florian Weimer
2002-02-06 15:32 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-06 16:54 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-06 22:19 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-06 17:30 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-06 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-06 19:58 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-06 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-06 23:54 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-07 8:07 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-07 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-07 17:26 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-07 19:46 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-08 0:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-08 5:28 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-08 6:06 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-08 6:14 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-08 6:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-07 10:50 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-06 19:38 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-06 23:06 ` Larry McVoy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-06 7:33 Jeramy B. Smith
2002-02-06 15:15 ` Florian Weimer
2002-02-07 16:50 ` Jan Harkes
2002-02-07 23:06 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-07 21:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-08 1:02 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-07 21:23 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-02-07 21:28 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-07 21:25 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-08 2:32 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-08 15:33 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-08 21:35 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-11 8:20 ` Josh MacDonald
2002-02-11 15:00 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-11 20:25 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-11 22:14 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-12 5:17 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-12 3:59 ` Theodore Tso
2002-02-12 6:19 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-02-12 20:28 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-12 22:54 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-13 0:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-13 9:41 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-13 10:35 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 11:01 ` Josh MacDonald
2002-02-12 11:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-18 18:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-03-10 8:36 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-10 19:41 ` Itai Nahshon
2002-03-10 20:19 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-10 21:16 ` Rob Turk
2002-03-10 21:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-10 21:23 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-11 8:22 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-10 21:28 ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-11 11:04 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-03-11 9:46 ` Harald Arnesen
2002-03-10 21:37 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-11 5:48 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 5:52 ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-11 6:15 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 6:37 ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-11 6:42 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-11 13:13 ` yodaiken
2002-03-11 15:51 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 16:08 ` yodaiken
2002-03-11 16:56 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 22:51 ` James Antill
2002-03-12 7:58 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-12 22:37 ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13 8:09 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-13 15:10 ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-03-13 14:37 ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13 16:26 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-13 16:30 ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13 19:18 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 14:05 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-03-11 10:46 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-03-11 11:32 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 15:29 ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 16:08 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 16:25 ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 17:08 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 17:16 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-03-11 18:41 ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 19:15 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 21:33 ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 21:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-11 22:01 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-11 22:19 ` Steven Cole
2002-03-12 0:14 ` Robert Pfister
2002-03-12 1:28 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-03-12 18:08 Thunder from the hill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1012981874.6918.10.camel@zeus \
--to=reid.hekman@ndsu.nodak.edu \
--cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox