public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beezly <beezly@beezly.org.uk>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sun GEM card looses TX on x86 32bit PCI
Date: 12 Mar 2002 20:34:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1015965269.1937.22.camel@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020312.093134.35196670.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1015881102.4312.10.camel@monkey> <1015881814.4315.12.camel@monkey> <1015887102.2051.4.camel@monkey>  <20020312.093134.35196670.davem@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2630 bytes --]

Hi David,

This looks like it's working!

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:BA:04:5B:D7
          inet addr:10.0.0.12  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::203:baff:fe04:5bd7/10 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:623264 errors:0 dropped:4 overruns:4 frame:4
          TX packets:501679 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:864388119 (824.3 MiB)  TX bytes:719041874 (685.7 MiB)
          Interrupt:5 Base address:0x8400

There are a few dropped packets, and the card misses a few incoming
immediatly after a dropped packet although I guess this is it picking
itself up off the ground after RX has hung.

Also, regarding the missing MAC address on most architectures, I have it
on good authority that the last six digits of the MAC address are stored
in the Vital Product Data area on the PCI boards (presumably because the
first 6 are the "standard" SUN MAC prefix).

I had a quick fiddle around with pci_find_capability(<blah>,
PCI_CAP_ID_VPD), but it always returns NULL (i.e. no VPD). However, I've
also noticed that no-one appears to use that macro in any of the kernel
source. Is there another way to look at the VPD?

Many Thanks,

Beezly

On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 17:31, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Beezly <beezly@beezly.org.uk>
>    Date: 11 Mar 2002 22:51:42 +0000
> 
>    Ok, I've been fiddling around with the driver tonight and have managed
>    to get a little further by forcing the driver to do a full reset of the
>    chip when the RX buffer over flows. I achieved this by sticking a return
>    1; at the top of gem_rxmac_reset().
>    
>    I'm guessing this isn't an "optimal" reset for the situation but so far
>    it's having /reasonable/ results (i.e. I don't have to bring the
>    interface up and down every 30 seconds!).
>  ...   
>    Hope this helps,
> 
> I'll follow up on this and figure out why my RX reset code
> isn't working after I finish up some 2.5.x work.
> 
> But looking quickly I think I see what is wrong.  Please give
> this a try (and remember to remove your hacks before testing
> this :-):
> 
> --- drivers/net/sungem.c.~1~	Mon Mar 11 04:24:13 2002
> +++ drivers/net/sungem.c	Tue Mar 12 09:30:38 2002
> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static int gem_rxmac_reset(struct gem *g
>  
>  		rxd->status_word = cpu_to_le64(RXDCTRL_FRESH(gp));
>  	}
> +	gp->rx_new = gp->rx_old = 0;
>  
>  	/* Now we must reprogram the rest of RX unit. */
>  	desc_dma = (u64) gp->gblock_dvma;


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-12 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-10 20:36 Sun GEM card looses TX on x86 32bit PCI Beezly
2002-03-11  0:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11  8:19   ` Beezly
2002-03-11 12:19     ` Beezly
2002-03-11 12:21       ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 18:35         ` Beezly
2002-03-11 19:02           ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 21:11             ` Beezly
2002-03-11 21:23               ` Beezly
2002-03-11 22:51                 ` Beezly
2002-03-12 17:31                   ` David S. Miller
2002-03-12 20:34                     ` Beezly [this message]
2002-03-12 20:39                       ` David S. Miller
2002-03-14 20:43                     ` Aaron Sethman
2002-03-14 21:21                       ` Aaron Sethman
2002-03-11  1:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11  1:58   ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11  8:29     ` Beezly
2002-03-11  8:42       ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1015965269.1937.22.camel@monkey \
    --to=beezly@beezly.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox