public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Schaefer <frank.schafer@setuza.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: syscals
Date: 09 Apr 2002 12:06:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1018346790.680.10.camel@ADMIN> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020409021047.518A53ECC@sitemail.everyone.net>

On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 04:10, mark manning wrote:
> ok - according to unistd.h we now have exactly 256 syscalls allocated (unless im missing something).  my code needs to be able to account for every single possible syscall and so i need to be able to store the syscall number in a standard way.  not all syscalls are catered for on the outset by at any time the user can say "i need to use syscall x which takes y parameters" and the code will be able to take care of it.
> 
> the problem is that i am currently reserving only 8 bits for the syscall number.  this is ok for now but if we ever get another syscall its going to be unuseable by my existing code :) - should i be reserving 16 bits now in preperation for some new syscalls being added ?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
Hmm...

dunno if you got this right. There are maximal 256 syscalls possible,
and, right -- exactly this amount of syscalls is in the entrytable. But
alotalotalot of them are defined as sys_ni_syscall (not yet
implemented).
I think there is still some space for enhancements. See
arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.

Regards
Frank



  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-09 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-09  2:10 syscals mark manning
2002-04-09 10:06 ` Frank Schaefer [this message]
2002-04-09 10:19   ` Compaq Alpha DS10 - Kernel 2.4.18 Oliver Pitzeier
2002-04-09 11:25     ` Damian Wrobel
2002-04-09 12:16     ` dr john halewood
2002-04-09 15:09   ` syscals Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1018346790.680.10.camel@ADMIN \
    --to=frank.schafer@setuza.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox