public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liam Girdwood <l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk>
To: BALBIR SINGH <balbir.singh@wipro.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Olaf Fraczyk <olaf@navi.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?
Date: 16 Apr 2002 11:29:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1018952961.31914.446.camel@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAEGIMDAKGCBHLBAACGBEEONCEAA.balbir.singh@wipro.com>

On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 09:18, BALBIR SINGH wrote:
> I remember seeing somewhere unix system VII used to have HZ set to 60
> for the machines built in the 70's. I wonder if todays pentium iiis and ivs
> should still use HZ of 100, though their internal clock is in GHz. 
> 
> I think somethings in the kernel may be tuned for the value of HZ, these
> things would be arch specific.
> 
> Increasing the HZ on your system should change the scheduling behaviour,
> it could lead to more aggresive scheduling and could affect the
> behaviour of the VM subsystem if scheduling happens more frequently. I am
> just guessing, I do not know.
> 

I remember reading that a higher HZ value will make your machine more
responsive, but will also mean that each running process will have a
smaller CPU time slice and that the kernel will spend more CPU time
scheduling at the expense of processes. 


HTH 

Liam Girdwood

> Changing though trivial would require a good look at all the code that
> uses HZ.
> 
> Comments,
> Balbir
> 
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> |[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of William Lee
> |Irwin III
> |Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:45 PM
> |To: Olaf Fraczyk
> |Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> |Subject: Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?
> |
> |
> |On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:47:48AM +0200, Olaf Fraczyk wrote:
> |> Hi,
> |> I would like to know why exactly this value was choosen.
> |> Is it safe to change it to eg. 1024? Will it break anything?
> |> What else should I change to get it working:
> |> CLOCKS_PER_SEC?
> |> Please CC me.
> |> Regards,
> |> Olaf Fraczyk
> |
> |I tried a few times running with HZ == 1024 for some testing (or I guess
> |just to see what happened). I didn't see any problems, even without the
> |obscure CLOCKS_PER_SEC ELF business.
> |
> |
> |Cheers,
> |Bill
> |-
> |To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> |the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> |More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> |Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> ----
> 

> **************************Disclaimer************************************
>       
> 
> 
> Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited
> is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any
> use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL
> in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
>  ********************************************************************
-- 
Liam Girdwood
l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk (Work)
liam@nova-ioe.org (Home)


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-16  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-16  7:47 Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Olaf Fraczyk
2002-04-16  8:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-16  8:18   ` BALBIR SINGH
2002-04-16 10:29     ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2002-04-16 10:01       ` Olaf Fraczyk
2002-04-16 13:35         ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-16 13:38           ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-16 13:55             ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-16 15:32             ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 16:12               ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-16 17:12               ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-16 13:58           ` Alan Cox
2002-04-17  0:22             ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-16 16:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:50           ` David Mosberger
2002-04-16 17:18             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-16 17:52               ` David Mosberger
2002-04-16 18:10                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-17  0:49               ` David Mosberger
2002-04-17  0:57                 ` Robert Love
2002-04-17  1:07                   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-17  5:18                   ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-17  5:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-17  6:01                       ` Robert Love
2002-04-17  6:17                         ` David Mosberger
2002-04-17  7:59                         ` arjan
2002-04-17  8:04                         ` Matti Aarnio
2002-04-23 22:42                           ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-04-17 10:12                       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18  1:51                   ` Dan Mann
2002-04-17  1:22                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-17  3:19                 ` Ben Greear
2002-04-17  7:55                 ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-21 18:00                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-22 17:20                   ` John Alvord
2002-04-22 21:52                     ` george anzinger
2002-04-22 23:06                       ` J.D. Bakker
2002-04-22 23:26                       ` Anton Blanchard
2002-04-23 19:03                         ` george anzinger
2002-04-23  7:08                       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-22 17:24                   ` David Mosberger
2002-04-16 12:42     ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-16 12:31   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-16 14:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-16 21:34 ` bert hubert
2002-04-16 22:21   ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-16 22:37     ` Herbert Xu
2002-04-16 22:56       ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-17  0:34         ` J. Dow
2002-04-17  2:40         ` Herbert Xu
2002-04-17 12:44       ` Kent Borg
2002-04-17  8:28     ` please merge 64-bit jiffy patches. Was " bert hubert
2002-04-17 11:05       ` please merge 64-bit jiffy patches Tim Schmielau
2002-04-17 11:12         ` bert hubert
2002-04-17 12:33           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-17 12:42             ` bert hubert
2002-04-17 14:57               ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-17 11:09       ` please merge 64-bit jiffy patches. Was Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Wakko Warner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-16 10:41 Cabaniols, Sebastien
2002-04-17  0:33 Chen, Kenneth W
2002-04-17  1:02 ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found] <3CC4861C.F21859A6@mvista.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <E16zuPf-0007yD-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-23  7:17   ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-23 19:09     ` george anzinger
2002-04-24  1:42       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-24 20:20         ` george anzinger
2002-04-27 20:26           ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28  6:02             ` george anzinger
2002-04-28  9:12               ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28 17:34                 ` george anzinger
2002-04-28 18:59                   ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28 21:50                     ` george anzinger
2002-04-29  0:14                       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-23 19:24     ` george anzinger
2002-04-23 19:35       ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-24 17:25         ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1018952961.31914.446.camel@swordfish \
    --to=l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk \
    --cc=balbir.singh@wipro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olaf@navi.pl \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox