Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?

Anton Blanchard
2002-04-22T23:27:41Z

> Please folks. When can we put the "tick on demand" thing to bed? If in
> doubt, get the patch from the high-res-timers sourceforge site (see
> signature for the URL) and try it. Overhead becomes higher with system
> load passing the ticked system at relatively light loads. Just what we
> want, very low overhead idle systems!
>
> The problem is in accounting (or time slicing if you prefer) where we
> need to start a timer each time a task is context switched to, and stop
> it when the task is switched away. The overhead is purely in the set up
> and tear down. MOST of these never expire.

Did you work out where exactly the overhead was and if it was hardware
specific? On ppc for example updating the timer is just a write to a cpu
register.

Anton