From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:10:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:10:40 -0400 Received: from violet.setuza.cz ([194.149.118.97]:9995 "EHLO violet.setuza.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:10:39 -0400 Subject: Re: What compiler to use From: Frank Schaefer To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200204302043.24504.wom@tateyama.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 30 Apr 2002 14:10:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1020168635.419.11.camel@ADMIN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 13:43, Gabor Kerenyi wrote: > On Tuesday 30 April 2002 20:33, Frank Schaefer wrote: > > I plan to build a linux box for kernel development (only). Which > > compiler would you suggest me to use? > > As of today I'm using gcc-2.95.3 on all my production machines. Is this > > still the preferred compiler for kernel work, or should I change to > > 3.0.x? > > I use 2.95.2 for the test machine and gcc-3.1 from cvs on the other. There's > no problem. > gcc-3.1 gives a bit more warning. (I use 3.1 at home also) > but don't try to use gcc 3.2 because the kernel won't compile in some cases. > > Gabor > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Thanks Frank