* Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1)
[not found] <200205031106.g43B6Mv04822@bitshadow.namesys.com>
@ 2002-05-03 11:32 ` Chris Mason
2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2002-05-03 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, reiserfs-dev
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 07:06, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
> You can pull the changes from our public server at
>
> bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.5
It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make
the whole thing look a little messy.
ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-)
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1)
2002-05-03 11:32 ` [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) Chris Mason
@ 2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-05-03 11:53 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Drokin @ 2002-05-03 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason; +Cc: Hans Reiser, torvalds, linux-kernel, reiserfs-dev
Hello!
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:32:08AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make
> the whole thing look a little messy.
Any hints on how to do that?
> ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-)
And ttt was not changeset commet, but one of the checkins comment, I believe.
Agreed, I just forgot to change it to something more meaningful at commit time,
and do not know how to change it later ;)
Bye,
Oleg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1)
2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin
@ 2002-05-03 11:53 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2002-05-03 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Drokin; +Cc: Hans Reiser, torvalds, linux-kernel, reiserfs-dev
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 07:37, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:32:08AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> > It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make
> > the whole thing look a little messy.
>
> Any hints on how to do that?
Heh, this time I'll try to form actual coherent sentences. The only way
to get rid of the excludes is to export as a patch and redo the bk
tree. This is a relatively small set of patches, so I think it's worth
it.
>
> > ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-)
> And ttt was not changeset commet, but one of the checkins comment, I believe.
Yes, sorry.
>
> Agreed, I just forgot to change it to something more meaningful at commit time,
> and do not know how to change it later ;)
bk comments should do the trick.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-03 11:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200205031106.g43B6Mv04822@bitshadow.namesys.com>
2002-05-03 11:32 ` [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) Chris Mason
2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-05-03 11:53 ` Chris Mason
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox