From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 07:54:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 07:54:13 -0400 Received: from 216-42-72-144.ppp.netsville.net ([216.42.72.144]:653 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 07:54:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) From: Chris Mason To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Hans Reiser , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20020503153750.A877@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 03 May 2002 07:53:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1020426839.1510.124.camel@tiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 07:37, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:32:08AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make > > the whole thing look a little messy. > > Any hints on how to do that? Heh, this time I'll try to form actual coherent sentences. The only way to get rid of the excludes is to export as a patch and redo the bk tree. This is a relatively small set of patches, so I think it's worth it. > > > ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-) > And ttt was not changeset commet, but one of the checkins comment, I believe. Yes, sorry. > > Agreed, I just forgot to change it to something more meaningful at commit time, > and do not know how to change it later ;) bk comments should do the trick. -chris