* [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
@ 2002-05-07 18:03 Robert Love
2002-05-08 12:32 ` Tomas Szepe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Love @ 2002-05-07 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
The preempt-kernel patch for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 is now available at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-ac4-1.patch
and
http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/
There are no notable changes; just the (extensive) resync against all
the scheduler changes that went into 2.4.19-pre7-ac3. Enjoy,
Robert Love
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
@ 2002-05-08 10:59 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-05-08 11:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin.Knoblauch @ 2002-05-08 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rml; +Cc: linux-kernel
> The preempt-kernel patch for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 is now available at
What about lock-break for the -ac series? Or does this conflict with rmap
and/or O(1)?
Martin
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
2002-05-08 10:59 Martin.Knoblauch
@ 2002-05-08 11:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2002-05-08 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin.Knoblauch; +Cc: rml, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:59:17PM +0200, Martin.Knoblauch wrote:
> What about lock-break for the -ac series? Or does this conflict with rmap
> and/or O(1)?
Speaking from experience, it's trivial to port it to either of those, or
a combination of both.
Cheers,
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
2002-05-08 12:32 ` Tomas Szepe
@ 2002-05-08 12:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-05-08 16:39 ` Robert Love
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2002-05-08 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomas Szepe; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > The preempt-kernel patch for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 is now available at
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-ac4-1.patch
>
> ... applies to -pre8-ac1 as well. Safe to use?
I'd presume so, pre8-ac1 is a compilation fixes release, as stated in the
changelog.
--
http://function.linuxpower.ca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
2002-05-07 18:03 [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 Robert Love
@ 2002-05-08 12:32 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-08 12:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-05-08 16:39 ` Robert Love
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Szepe @ 2002-05-08 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Love; +Cc: linux-kernel
> The preempt-kernel patch for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 is now available at
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-ac4-1.patch
... applies to -pre8-ac1 as well. Safe to use?
T.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
2002-05-08 12:32 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-08 12:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
@ 2002-05-08 16:39 ` Robert Love
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Love @ 2002-05-08 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomas Szepe; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 05:32, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > The preempt-kernel patch for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 is now available at
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-ac4-1.patch
>
> ... applies to -pre8-ac1 as well. Safe to use?
Yep. I sent Alan a few more scheduler updates - if he puts them in
pre8-ac2, that may break the diff but still nothing incompatible.
Always assume (with most patches, really) that if it applies, it is
fine.
An exception would be things like lock-break or low-latency that assume
intricate knowledge of the locking and calling semantics of functions.
If they apply, they should compile and boot, but a deadlock may lurk.
This is partly why these solutions are horrible to maintain or get right
and the preemptible kernel is a wiser long-term solution to latency and
such.
Robert Love
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-08 16:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-07 18:03 [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 Robert Love
2002-05-08 12:32 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-08 12:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-05-08 16:39 ` Robert Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-08 10:59 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-05-08 11:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox