From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:12:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:12:10 -0400 Received: from as3-1-8.ras.s.bonet.se ([217.215.75.181]:3976 "EHLO garbo.kenjo.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:12:09 -0400 Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 From: Kenneth Johansson To: Keith Owens Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com In-Reply-To: <3038.1021588938@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 17 May 2002 09:11:58 +0200 Message-Id: <1021619519.5859.7.camel@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 00:42, Keith Owens wrote: > Before I send you the kbuild 2.5 patch, how do you want to handle it? Why do you not just make a patch the way that makes most sens to you and sent it to him. If you asked me I think it's working so good that you can just rip out the old one. Ps. The only strange thing left that I could find was that I could not skip the makefile gen when I only wanted to run a config front. make NO_MAKEFILE_GEN=1 xconfig