public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net>
To: Stephane Charette <scharette@packeteer.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent kernel SMP scalability Benchmark/White-paper References.
Date: 23 May 2002 23:01:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1022212915.23894.31.camel@UberGeek> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020524002323Z317055-22651+51447@vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 19:23, Stephane Charette wrote:
> On 23 May 2002 17:41:55 -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> 
> >I was looking around on google web, google groups, lkml digests,
> >Intel.com, RedHat, SuSe, SGI.com, osdl.com, etc for some benchmarks of
> >recent 2.4.x kernels, say 2.4.x > 16, with references to SMP scalability
> >problems or successes, etc. Mainly centering around 4-way/8-way x86
> >testing in terms of memory bandwidth/utilization, threading performance,
> >etc. 
> 
> All I've found so far is:
> 
> http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/als2000/full_papers/bryantscale/bryantscale.pdf
> 

Yeah..been there, done that. Most stuff I've found is no newer than
2000. :( I really need something recent. 

> which is based on the 2.2.14-SMP -vs- 2.3.99-SMP kernels.
> 
> >I'm hoping to create a white-paper internally, and hopefully externally
> >at some point, which can be maintained so others don't have to do the
> >same arduous task of trying to find recent data as it pertains to said
> >statistics.
> 
> If you find anything else, or get forwarded any information, please post the relevant information where possible.  There are many of us looking for benchmark information on recent 2.4.x kernels.  Seems like a few companies/projects are currently looking at the costs/benefits/risks of moving up to the new kernel.
> 
That is the plan. Like with my recently completed Multi-Realm Kerberos
install docs that I've been working on, everything I collect will get
out for public knowledge.Sharing our experiences is the only way to make
the world a better place. 


> Regards,
> 
> Stephane Charette


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-24  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-23 22:41 Recent kernel SMP scalability Benchmark/White-paper References Austin Gonyou
2002-05-23 23:34 ` Hanna Linder
2002-05-24  4:04   ` Austin Gonyou
2002-05-24  6:15     ` Hanna V Linder
2002-05-24 16:32       ` Austin Gonyou
2002-05-24  0:23 ` Stephane Charette
2002-05-24  4:01   ` Austin Gonyou [this message]
     [not found] <200205240230.g4O2U97457880@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
2002-05-24  3:59 ` Austin Gonyou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1022212915.23894.31.camel@UberGeek \
    --to=austin@digitalroadkill.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scharette@packeteer.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox