From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:32:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:32:57 -0400 Received: from [209.184.141.163] ([209.184.141.163]:39344 "HELO UberGeek") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:32:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Recent kernel SMP scalability Benchmark/White-paper References. From: Austin Gonyou To: Hanna V Linder Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <345429561.1022195743@[10.10.2.2]> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) Date: 24 May 2002 11:32:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1022257966.9619.21.camel@UberGeek> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 01:15, Hanna V Linder wrote: > > documentation out there hadn't been updated in quite some time as well. > > I have updated some 8-way kernel comparisons running dbench as recently > as a couple weeks ago. Although, I do not know of any specific > Linux(TM) vs Solaris(TM) benchmark results on the lse web site. ;) > What benchmark would reflect your workload? > Kewl again. I didn't see them, but thanks anyway. I'll check them out. > Speaking of OLS, Is there any interest in an lse-tech BOF or get- > to-gether of some sort in Ottawa this summer? It would be nice > to put some more faces to names from the conference calls. > I wish. My company doesn't *send* me anywhere. :) One last question for the list. Is there a recent 2.2.x vs. 2.4.x SMP kernel comparison available as well? Recent can be as much as 9-10 mo ago, preferably younger though.