From: Kenneth Johansson <ken@canit.se>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Subject: Re: KBuild 2.5 Impressions
Date: 30 May 2002 16:08:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1022767735.4032.5.camel@tiger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CF62020.2030704@evision-ventures.com>
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 14:50, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> > Along the way, old kbuild did the usual wrong things:
> >
> > - In the incremental build, 6 files rebuilt that should not have been
> >
> > - Once, when I interrupted the make dep, subsequent make deps would
> > no longer work, forcing me to do make mrproper and start again.
> >
> > - Way too much output to the screen
>
> Bull shit: make -s helps.
In that case it's way to little. In kbuild2.5 it's actually easy to spot
if the correct files get compiled after a change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-30 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-30 9:45 KBuild 2.5 Impressions Daniel Phillips
2002-05-30 12:50 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 14:08 ` Kenneth Johansson [this message]
2002-05-30 13:28 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-05-30 21:55 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-05-30 22:29 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-05-30 23:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 0:09 ` David Lang
2002-05-31 0:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 0:32 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-03 7:21 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-31 0:13 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-31 0:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 1:20 ` Skip Ford
2002-05-31 1:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 13:48 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-31 14:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-31 15:21 ` Thunder from the hill
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205302129120.29405-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
2002-05-31 4:01 ` Skip Ford
2002-05-31 4:46 ` KBuild 2.5 Migration Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 5:12 ` Skip Ford
2002-05-31 0:48 ` KBuild 2.5 Impressions Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-31 3:29 ` Hua Zhong
2002-05-31 3:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 3:55 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 4:03 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-06-02 6:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-02 7:58 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-06-02 14:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-02 14:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-06-02 15:05 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 15:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-02 18:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-06-02 18:39 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 18:57 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-06-02 19:15 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-03 2:04 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-06-02 15:47 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 11:21 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-06-02 11:37 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 11:53 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-06-02 12:03 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 12:09 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 12:51 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-06-02 14:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-03 2:49 Dan Kegel
2002-06-03 3:28 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1022767735.4032.5.camel@tiger \
--to=ken@canit.se \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox