From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 10:09:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 10:09:13 -0400 Received: from as3-1-8.ras.s.bonet.se ([217.215.75.181]:38793 "EHLO garbo.kenjo.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 10:09:12 -0400 Subject: Re: KBuild 2.5 Impressions From: Kenneth Johansson To: Martin Dalecki Cc: Daniel Phillips , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Owens In-Reply-To: <3CF62020.2030704@evision-ventures.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 30 May 2002 16:08:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1022767735.4032.5.camel@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 14:50, Martin Dalecki wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Along the way, old kbuild did the usual wrong things: > > > > - In the incremental build, 6 files rebuilt that should not have been > > > > - Once, when I interrupted the make dep, subsequent make deps would > > no longer work, forcing me to do make mrproper and start again. > > > > - Way too much output to the screen > > Bull shit: make -s helps. In that case it's way to little. In kbuild2.5 it's actually easy to spot if the correct files get compiled after a change.