From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Lightweight patch manager <patch@luckynet.dynu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.20-ct1
Date: 04 Jun 2002 09:48:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1023209337.912.103.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206032239500.3833-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 21:41, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > Please discard the atomic update patch altogether; there were enough
> > eyebrows raised that this cannot qualify as a simple cleanup.
>
> Is there something serious to add about them? Is it sure that they won't
> work or such? Otherwise I'd suggest just getting them tested.
Maybe it is not wise to integrate a tree with patches you do to know are
correct or not?
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-04 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-04 3:58 linux-2.5.20-ct1 Lightweight patch manager
2002-06-04 4:23 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-04 4:30 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 Thunder from the hill
2002-06-04 4:37 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-04 4:41 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 Thunder from the hill
2002-06-04 4:48 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-04 16:48 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-06-04 16:58 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 Thunder from the hill
2002-06-04 4:40 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-04 4:41 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-04 4:42 ` linux-2.5.20-ct1 William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1023209337.912.103.camel@sinai \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patch@luckynet.dynu.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=thunder@ngforever.de \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox