public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_NR_CPUS, redux
Date: 11 Jun 2002 11:28:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1023820116.22156.271.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206111917310.3521-100000@sharra.ivimey.org>

On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:21, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:

> Perhaps it's just because I'm coming in late, but I cannot understand why
> NR_CPUS cannot be as low as 4 by default, for all archs, and then in the
> kernel boot messages, should more be found than is configured for a message is
> emitted to say "reconfigure your kernel", and continue with the number it was
> configured for. I personally only rarely see 2-way boxes, 4-way is pretty
> rare, and anything more must surely count as very specialized.

Ugh let's stop this thread now.  Two points:

	(a) imo, the kernel should support out-of-the-box the maximum
	    number of CPUs it can handle.  Be lucky we now have a
	    configure option to change that.  But that does not matter..

	(b) Right now it is 32.  Now you can change it... if you want
	    to change the current behavior by _default_ why don't we
	    suggest that _after_ this is accepted into 2.5?  I.e., one
	    battle at a time.

Thanks,

	Robert Love


  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-11 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-11 17:52 [PATCH] CONFIG_NR_CPUS, redux Robert Love
2002-06-11 18:09 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-06-11 18:19   ` Robert Love
2002-06-11 18:21   ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-06-11 18:28     ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-06-12  1:36       ` jw schultz
2002-06-12 15:06       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-12 15:22         ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-11 18:29     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-11 23:20       ` Dave Jones
2002-06-13  8:51     ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-19 11:53       ` Bill Davidsen
2002-06-11 20:10 ` Rob Radez
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-12  3:29 Matt_Domsch
2002-06-12  4:13 ` Austin Gonyou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1023820116.22156.271.camel@sinai \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox