From: Ed Sweetman <safemode@speakeasy.net>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: non-critical ext3-fs errors and IDE issues with 2.4.19-rc3
Date: 23 Jul 2002 20:19:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1027469995.496.6.camel@psuedomode> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020723204833.GR25899@clusterfs.com>
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 16:48, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2002 16:28 -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> > I notice these errors every now and then on my 100GB WD drive
> > (partitioned into bits) and particularly on this partition that I
> > compile everything on.
> >
> > EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,7)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory
> > #17821: directory entry across blocks - offset=24, inode=17822,
> > rec_len=4076, name_len=3
>
> This is definitely a bad entry - offset + rec_len (4100) != blocksize (4096).
> Strange. You need to run e2fsck -f on this partition. It sounds like
> you are getting some corruption or bit flips happening.
>
> > Now these errors dont cause the system to panic like other ext3 errors
> > do, so i'm wondering what the significance of these errors are.
>
> Well, this is an error, and the next time the computer is restarted it
> should force a full fsck on the partition. The other "panic" (oops)
> situations are when things are totally shot and it is better to stop
> doing anything than try and continue. In this case, it is possible to
> continue, but that doesn't mean things are OK.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
I rebooted after setting max mount count to 1 so it would force and
fsck, I got no error messages. So, I dropped to shell in single mode
and attempted to unmount /usr (the partition with the issues) but umount
insisted /usr was busy. I looked at ps, nothing executed from usr. I
looked at my shell, nothing executed on /usr. I looked at lsof, nothing
showing /usr files being accessed. It didn't make any sense at all but
then there are other surprises with 2.4.19-rc3 that come later. I fsck
-f'd the partition again with dma disabled and still, no errors
reported. Either it fixed them behind the scenes or didn't detect
them. I then went and looked at my dmesg to notice this interesting
message
PDC20262: chipset revision 1
ide: Skipping Promise RAID controller.
Now this is funny. I dont remember telling the kernel to skip my other
ide controller. I double checked the config, nope, no ignoring or
skipping of the promise ide controller. This did not occur in previous
kernels, it seems to be brand new in rc3. I confess to having used jam
kernels with rc2 and rc1 though which had other ide patches in it. So
what gives with this ? Why is rc3 skipping the promise ide
controller? And why is fsck not reporting any fixes to errors that
dmesg shows is being detected during use?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-24 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-23 20:28 non-critical ext3-fs errors? Ed Sweetman
2002-07-23 20:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-07-24 0:19 ` Ed Sweetman [this message]
2002-07-24 23:01 ` non-critical ext3-fs errors and IDE issues with 2.4.19-rc3 Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1027469995.496.6.camel@psuedomode \
--to=safemode@speakeasy.net \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox