From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Dan Aloni <da-x@gmx.net>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection.
Date: 06 Sep 2002 10:35:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1031322928.940.41.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020906092829.GA32379@callisto.yi.org>
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 05:28, Dan Aloni wrote:
> task_t, anyone?
I actually like task_t, and it is my lone typedef exception, but maybe I
am the exception...
My real complaint against typedefs (and list_t in particular) is their
inconsistent use. I think we have done a good job universally using
task_t vs struct task_struct, and thus its not an issue to keep it...
On the other hand, I would not scream too loudly over its removal.
Anyhow, I think any change should be ack'ed by Ingo because its his code
and he deals with it a disappropriately large amount of the time.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-06 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-02 5:23 [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection Rusty Russell
2002-09-02 5:51 ` Robert Love
2002-09-02 6:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-02 6:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:05 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-03 22:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-03 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-04 0:41 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-04 1:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-04 2:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-04 2:44 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-04 14:36 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-09-04 6:11 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-02 6:23 ` Neil Brown
2002-09-01 20:45 ` Nick Piggin
2002-09-02 6:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-02 10:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 6:17 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-06 9:28 ` Dan Aloni
2002-09-06 14:35 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-09-09 5:57 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1031322928.940.41.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=da-x@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox