From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:48:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:48:14 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:58639 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:48:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Read-Copy Update 2.5.34 From: Robert Love To: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Rusty Russell , Andrea Arcangeli , Paul McKenney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020911195939.E28198@in.ibm.com> References: <20020911164940.C28198@in.ibm.com> <20020911175011.D28198@in.ibm.com> <1031753011.950.106.camel@phantasy> <20020911195939.E28198@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 11 Sep 2002 14:52:46 -0400 Message-Id: <1031770371.4693.113.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 10:29, Dipankar Sarma wrote: > Sorry, I should have been more careful labelling them - those are 2.5.34-preempt > vs 2.5.34-preempt-rcu numbers. I did them first because rcu-poll-preempt > kernel has a conditinal branch in fast path and hence more interesting. > I will publish the vanilla vs rcu_poll reflex numbers in a few minutes > from now. Ahh OK. Results are OK, then - thanks :-) > Our OLS paper and presentation too deals with preemption - > > http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/rclock/rcu.2002.07.08.pdf > http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/rclock/rclock.OLS.2002.07.08a.pdf Yep. Was there, saw the talk, got the t-shirt. Robert Love