public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:14:15 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032423255.3d89875787cb4@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17rwJh-0000vS-00@starship>

Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>:

> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > > No Load:
> > > > Kernel                  Time            CPU
> > > > 2.4.19                  68.14           99%
> > > > 2.4.20-pre7             68.11           99%
> > > > 2.5.34                  69.88           99%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7              68.40           98%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap         68.73           99%
> > > > 2.4.19-cc               68.37           99%
> > > > 2.5.36                  69.58           99%
> > >
> > > page_add/remove_rmap.  Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.
> > 
> > Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in
> > Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)
> 
> I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are
> getting close to statistically insignificant.

These ones definitely are insignificant. I've found the limit with repeat
measurements about +/- 1%

Con.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-19  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-18 14:46 [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36 Con Kolivas
2002-09-18 16:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 16:50   ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-19  8:05     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19  8:14       ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-09-18 21:17   ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-18 21:40     ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 23:55       ` NMI watchdog stability Jonathan Lundell
2002-09-19 12:07         ` John Levon
2002-09-19 13:20           ` Richard B. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1032423255.3d89875787cb4@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox