* [BENCHMARK] 2.5.38{-mm1} contest results
@ 2002-09-22 12:48 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2002-09-22 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Rik van Riel, Andrew Morton
Here are the latest contest results including 2.5.38 and 2.5.38-mm1
NoLoad:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 66.56 99%
2.4.19-ck7 65.77 99%
2.4.19-ac4 66.31 99%
2.5.36 67.45 99%
2.5.36-mm1 67.39 99%
2.5.37 67.25 99%
2.5.38 68.25 99%
2.5.38-mm1 67.17 99%
Process Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 81.29 80%
2.4.19-ck7 70.14 93%
2.4.19-ac4 71.10 92%
2.5.36 71.04 94%
2.5.36-mm1 70.68 95%
2.5.37 70.51 95%
2.5.38 71.60 95%
2.5.38-mm1 70.49 95%
IO Half Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 101.39 69%
2.4.19-ck7 75.96 88%
2.4.19-ac4 97.56 73%
2.5.36 79.30 91%
2.5.36-mm1 100.05 74%
2.5.37 77.69 93%
2.5.38 81.26 90%
2.5.38-mm1 82.52 87%
IO Full Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 170.70 41%
2.4.19-ck7 90.95 74%
2.4.19-ac4 105.53 68%
2.5.36 197.08 36%
2.5.36-mm1 220.14 33%
2.5.37 209.75 33%
2.5.38 170.21 42%
2.5.38-mm1 434.41 16%
Mem Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 93.33 77%
2.4.19-ck7 123.15 57%
2.4.19-ac4 117.09 61%
2.5.36 121.02 59%
2.5.36-mm1 100.47 73%
2.5.37 104.75 70%
2.5.38 104.22 70%
2.5.38-mm1 92.97 77%
As you can see, 2.5.38 is improving in most areas. 2.5.38-mm1 has excellent
performance under mem load now, but exhibits significant slow down under full IO
load.
To reproduce full IO load, continuously copy /dev/zero in Ram sized chunks to
the same disk and conduct a kernel compile on that disk and time the kernel compile.
http://contest.kolivas.net
Comments?
Con.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-09-22 12:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-22 12:48 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.38{-mm1} contest results Con Kolivas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox