From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:26:50 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032859610.3d902fda0c16a@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209240850.g8O8odp24965@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Quoting Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>:
> On 24 September 2002 01:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > (And if there's more than a 1% variation between same kernel, compiled
> > with different compilers then the test is bust. Kernel CPU time is
> > dominated by cache misses and runtime is dominated by IO wait.
> > Quality of code generation is of tiny significance)
>
> Well, not exactly. If it is true that Intel/MS compilers beat GCC
> by 30% on code size, 30% smaller kernel ought to make some difference.
>
> However, that will become a GCC code quality benchmark then.
Great well if someone has access to one of these compilers and can successfully
compile me a kernel using my .config I'd love to benchmark it for them.
Con.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-24 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209232236070.27095-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2002-09-24 2:45 ` [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 3:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-24 9:34 ` Jan Hudec
2002-09-24 13:45 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24 9:26 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-09-24 14:19 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24 15:47 ` Mark Hahn
2002-09-23 6:55 Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 10:30 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 11:03 ` jw schultz
2002-09-23 12:47 ` Erik Andersen
2002-09-23 13:00 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 13:15 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 14:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-23 14:02 ` Ryan Anderson
2002-09-23 14:15 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 14:24 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 14:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-09-23 16:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2002-09-23 14:43 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-24 21:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 16:34 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-09-23 21:47 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 1:12 ` jw schultz
2002-09-24 9:18 ` Jan Hudec
2002-09-23 14:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 14:36 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 21:27 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1032859610.3d902fda0c16a@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox