From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Thomas Molina <tmolina@cox.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stian Jordet <liste@jordet.nu>,
Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
Burton Windle <bwindle@fint.org>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
Stephen Marz <smarz@host187.south.iit.edu>,
"ALESSANDRO.SUARDI" <ALESSANDRO.SUARDI@oracle.com>,
Bob_Tracy <rct@gherkin.frus.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Subject: Re: 2.5 Problem Report Status
Date: 05 Oct 2002 14:05:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1033841151.742.3694.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210050924470.10630-100000@dad.molina>
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 12:57, Thomas Molina wrote:
> open 04 Oct 2002 scheduling while atomic oops
> 6. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103270005902896&w=2
>
> This appears to be a long-running problem. Is it related to the group of
> problems below involving "function might sleep while holding a lock" or is
> it a scheduling system problem?
This is the same thing as all those "sleeping while atomic"
(might_sleep) bugs below. It is just a debugging check. It does the
same check as might_sleep but during schedule().
If you had specific culprits (i.e. foo() calls bar() which schedules
while foo() holds the baz lock) would be very useful. Otherwise listing
this as a problem is not useful.
> open 29 Sep 2002 Oracle 9.2 goes OOM on startup
> 14. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103333545310595&w=2
>
> This problem was reported for 2.5.39. I have seen neither a followup, nor
> a reference to a fix. Does this problem still exist in 2.5.40?
Should be fixed in bk.
> open 2.5.40 init_irq() function doing unsafe
> things inside ide_lock
> 24. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103316967724891&w=2
>
> Might sleep while holding a lock.
Is this still not fixed? Ugh.
BTW, I like the fact you are listing specific atomicity issues. Thank
you. It is a lot more useful than just saying there are "sleeping while
atomic" bugs.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-05 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-05 16:57 2.5 Problem Report Status Thomas Molina
2002-10-05 17:19 ` Bjoern A. Zeeb
2002-10-05 17:38 ` Thomas Molina
2002-10-05 18:05 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-10-06 20:13 ` Gcc k6 testing account
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 17:01 Kent Yoder
2002-10-23 2:26 Grover, Andrew
2002-10-23 2:07 Thomas Molina
2002-10-23 2:28 ` Ben Collins
2002-10-23 2:43 ` Ben Collins
2002-10-23 7:58 ` Russell King
2002-10-23 9:53 ` jbradford
2002-10-23 10:35 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-10-23 12:21 ` jbradford
2002-10-23 12:26 ` jbradford
2002-10-23 13:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-23 14:14 ` jbradford
2002-10-23 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-23 15:31 ` jbradford
2002-10-23 17:03 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-10-23 17:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-26 14:18 ` Toon van der Pas
2002-10-26 19:06 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-10-23 14:29 ` erik
2002-10-23 13:41 ` caligula
2002-10-31 15:16 ` caligula
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210120758420.4532-100000@dad.molina>
2002-10-12 16:51 ` jbradford
2002-10-13 21:54 ` Stig Brautaset
2002-10-05 20:21 Mikael Pettersson
2002-10-05 22:10 ` Thomas Molina
2002-10-05 23:19 ` John Levon
2002-10-05 18:18 Steven Cole
2002-09-21 22:52 Thomas Molina
2002-09-21 22:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-21 23:26 ` Axel Siebenwirth
2002-09-18 8:39 Thomas Molina
2002-09-17 1:57 Thomas Molina
2002-09-17 12:37 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-17 20:58 ` Thomas Molina
2002-09-17 20:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-04 3:26 Thomas Molina
2002-09-04 3:43 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-04 3:52 ` Robert Love
2002-09-04 8:08 ` Axel H. Siebenwirth
2002-09-04 10:16 ` Thomas Molina
2002-08-19 0:25 2.5 Problem Report status Thomas Molina
2002-08-10 18:09 2.5 Problem Report Status Thomas Molina
2002-08-22 19:29 ` James Simmons
2002-07-26 15:18 Thomas Molina
2002-07-27 20:04 ` James Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1033841151.742.3694.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=ALESSANDRO.SUARDI@oracle.com \
--cc=bwindle@fint.org \
--cc=caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=liste@jordet.nu \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=rct@gherkin.frus.com \
--cc=smarz@host187.south.iit.edu \
--cc=tmolina@cox.net \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox