From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:46:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:46:43 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:61967 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:46:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] niceness magic numbers, 2.4.20-pre11 From: Robert Love To: Alan Cox Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Kristis Makris , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1035360961.4033.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1035360961.4033.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 23 Oct 2002 15:52:52 -0400 Message-Id: <1035402772.3171.1550.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 04:16, Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 07:37, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > --- ./include/linux/resource.h.nice Tue Jun 18 20:10:36 2002 > > +++ ./include/linux/resource.h Sat Oct 19 13:55:10 2002 > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > > }; > > > > #define PRIO_MIN (-20) > > -#define PRIO_MAX 20 > > +#define PRIO_MAX 19 > > I suspect this isnt correct Agreed. Its not. It should remain 20 and places that truly want 19 should do PRIO_MAX-1. The idea of cleaning up the magic numbers is fine, otherwise.. Robert Love