From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
manfred@colorfullife.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch
Date: 25 Oct 2002 09:21:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035555715.3447.150.camel@plars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB880E8.747C7EEC@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 18:23, mingming cao wrote:
> Thanks for your quick feedback. I did LTP tests on it--it passed(well,
> I saw a failure on shmctl(), but the failure was there since 2.5.43
> kernel). I will do more stress tests on it soon.
Which shmctl() test is this? To my knowledge, there are no current
known issues with shmctl tests. There is however one with sem02 in
semctl() that last I heard has been partially fixed in the kernel and
still needs to be fixed in glibc. Is that the one you are referring to,
or is there really some other shmctl test in LTP that is failing?
Thanks,
Paul Larson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-25 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 0:14 [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU mingming cao
2002-10-20 13:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-20 17:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 18:11 ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 19:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 21:49 ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch mingming cao
2002-10-24 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 22:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 23:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-25 0:35 ` [Lse-tech] " Rick Lindsley
2002-10-25 1:07 ` Robert Love
2002-10-25 0:07 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 4:18 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25 5:53 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 7:27 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25 5:36 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25 16:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 23:23 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 14:21 ` Paul Larson [this message]
2002-10-25 17:17 ` [Lse-tech] " mingming cao
2002-10-25 18:20 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 18:51 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 19:06 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 20:14 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 20:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25 0:38 ` Cliff White
2002-10-31 17:52 ` [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch [PERFORMANCE RESULTS] Bill Hartner
2002-10-21 19:18 ` [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 19:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 19:41 ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 20:14 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 18:07 ` mingming cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035555715.3447.150.camel@plars \
--to=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox