From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: chrisl@vmware.com, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
chrisl@gnuchina.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: writepage return value check in vmscan.c
Date: 25 Oct 2002 11:11:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035562304.5646.171.camel@plars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB86650.1C48F044@digeo.com>
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 16:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
> -ac kernels have an lru per zone and so would not be bitten
> by this failure. If indeed you are striking this problem,
> which is described at
> http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-mm/2002-08/msg00049.html
Is it the 2.4 or 2.5 (or both) ac kernels that have the per zone lru? I
have some stuff I'd like to try with that.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-25 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-24 8:25 writepage return value check in vmscan.c chrisl
2002-10-24 8:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 9:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-24 11:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 16:12 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 17:59 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 11:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 18:30 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 18:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 19:14 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 19:25 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 17:57 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 18:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 19:15 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 20:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 21:17 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 21:23 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 16:11 ` Paul Larson [this message]
2002-10-25 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-25 17:07 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-25 18:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-28 19:17 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-28 20:38 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 21:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-28 8:28 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-10-28 18:44 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 19:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-28 19:29 ` chrisl
2002-10-29 6:10 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 7:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-28 19:58 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 21:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-30 4:13 ` chrisl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035562304.5646.171.camel@plars \
--to=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=chrisl@gnuchina.org \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).