From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: "David D. Hagood" <wowbagger@sktc.net>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"'Dave Jones'" <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
"'akpm@digeo.com'" <akpm@digeo.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'chrisl@vmware.com'" <chrisl@vmware.com>,
"'Martin J. Bligh'" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo
Date: 25 Oct 2002 20:37:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035592677.734.4377.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB9D789.4020101@sktc.net>
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 19:45, David D. Hagood wrote:
> I would assert that, at least in the case of the P4, there IS a "major
> core", as the 2 subcores share L1 and bus controller access, as well as
> several other parts of the chip.
>
> I beleive this is to some extent the case in the Power4 modules - that
> each module contains resources shared by the execution units. However, I
> might be full of it, and since there are plenty of @ibm.com's here I
> expect to be corrected shortly....
You are entirely right :)
But argument for siblings vs. subcore is that in the context of the
processors displayed in /proc/cpuinfo known of them are "subscores" of
the other (and thus none of them are the "main core").
Some are just "siblings" in the same parent process package. So given a
dual Xeon machine, you have 4 virtual processors, which are broken into
two sets of two siblings. Those two sets are each part of the same
package.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-26 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-25 22:42 [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 22:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-25 23:21 ` David D. Hagood
2002-10-25 23:25 ` Robert Love
2002-10-25 23:45 ` David D. Hagood
2002-10-26 0:37 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-10-25 23:51 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-28 22:36 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-26 1:58 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-26 0:54 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-26 0:26 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 23:59 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-26 0:43 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-10-26 0:47 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-10-26 2:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-26 19:48 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-28 18:53 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 21:54 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-10-25 23:24 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 23:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-25 21:50 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 21:54 ` Robert Love
2002-10-25 22:19 ` chrisl
2002-10-25 22:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-25 22:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-25 22:10 ` Robert Love
2002-10-25 22:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-26 0:49 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-26 15:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-25 20:38 [PATCH] How to get number of physical CPU in linux from user space? Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 21:30 ` [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo Robert Love
2002-10-25 21:39 ` Robert Love
2002-10-26 0:01 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-26 0:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-26 0:12 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-26 0:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-26 0:33 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035592677.734.4377.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=wowbagger@sktc.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox