From: "David C. Hansen" <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
"Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reiser vs EXT3
Date: 31 Oct 2002 14:10:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1036102211.4272.276.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC1A5D5.8000901@namesys.com>
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote:
> If you want to talk about 2.6 then you should talk about reiser4 not
> reiserfs v3, and reiser4 is 7.6 times the write performance of ext3 for
> 30 copies of the linux kernel source code using modern IDE drives and
> modern processors on a dual-CPU box, so I don't think any amount of
> improved scalability will make ext3 competitive with reiser4 for
> performance usages.
>
> We haven't had anyone test performance using RAID yet for reiser4, that
> could be fun.
I have a 14-drive hardware RAID array on an 8-proc box. Is that the
kind of thing you want testing on? If you want to send me some testing
scripts, I'll run them.
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-31 14:19 Reiser vs EXT3 Robert L. Harris
2002-10-31 19:02 ` David C. Hansen
2002-10-31 20:49 ` David Lang
2002-10-31 21:51 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-31 22:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-31 23:03 ` Matthew Kirkwood
2002-10-31 22:10 ` David C. Hansen [this message]
2002-10-31 22:13 ` David C. Hansen
2002-10-31 22:14 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-31 20:23 ` Samuel Flory
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 22:52 Dieter Nützel
2002-11-01 1:16 ` David Lang
2002-11-01 0:51 Kevin Brosius
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1036102211.4272.276.camel@nighthawk \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox