public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David C. Hansen" <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reiser vs EXT3
Date: 31 Oct 2002 14:13:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1036102404.4272.285.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210311248030.25405-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 12:49, David Lang wrote:
> note that breaking up this locking bottleneckhas been done in the 2.5
> kernel series so when 2.6 is released this should be much less significant
> (Q2 2003 is the current thought, but don't count on it until it's out)

Actually, ext3 has been immune from most of the lock breakups in 2.5. 
ext2 used to have a lot of problems with BKL contention resulting from 
ext2_get_block() and some other assorted functions.  Al Viro cleaned
these up in early 2.5, but ext3 never got the cleanup.  It still scales
horribly, even 2.5.45.  

-- 
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-31 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-31 14:19 Reiser vs EXT3 Robert L. Harris
2002-10-31 19:02 ` David C. Hansen
2002-10-31 20:49   ` David Lang
2002-10-31 21:51     ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-31 22:05       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-31 23:03         ` Matthew Kirkwood
2002-10-31 22:10       ` David C. Hansen
2002-10-31 22:13     ` David C. Hansen [this message]
2002-10-31 22:14     ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-31 20:23 ` Samuel Flory
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 22:52 Dieter Nützel
2002-11-01  1:16 ` David Lang
2002-11-01  0:51 Kevin Brosius

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1036102404.4272.285.camel@nighthawk \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net \
    --cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox