From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:31:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1037057498.3dd03dda5a8b9@kolivas.net> (raw)
Here are the latest contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks up to and
including 2.5.47.
Note:
2.5.46-mm1 and later kernels tested now include preempt (previous ones didn't)
These tests were run on a system that uses reiserFS so the new changes are relevant.
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [5] 71.7 93 0 0 1.00
2.4.19 [5] 69.0 97 0 0 0.97
2.5.46 [2] 74.1 92 0 0 1.04
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 74.0 93 0 0 1.04
2.5.47 [3] 73.5 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 73.6 93 0 0 1.03
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [2] 66.6 99 0 0 0.93
2.4.19 [2] 68.0 99 0 0 0.95
2.5.46 [2] 67.9 99 0 0 0.95
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 68.9 99 0 0 0.96
2.5.47 [3] 68.3 99 0 0 0.96
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 68.4 99 0 0 0.96
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 109.5 57 119 44 1.53
2.4.19 [3] 106.5 59 112 43 1.49
2.5.46 [1] 92.9 74 36 29 1.30
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 82.7 82 21 21 1.16
2.5.47 [3] 83.4 82 22 21 1.17
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 83.0 83 21 20 1.16
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 117.4 63 1 7 1.64
2.4.19 [2] 106.5 70 1 8 1.49
2.5.46 [1] 98.3 80 1 7 1.38
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 95.3 80 1 5 1.33
2.5.47 [3] 93.9 80 1 5 1.32
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 94.0 81 1 5 1.32
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 150.8 49 2 8 2.11
2.4.19 [1] 132.4 55 2 9 1.85
2.5.46 [1] 113.5 67 1 8 1.59
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 227.1 34 3 7 3.18
2.5.47 [3] 167.1 45 2 7 2.34
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 118.5 64 1 7 1.66
Of note here is that 2.5.47 takes longer cf 2.5.46 despite adding preempt. Also
2.5.47-mm1 is substantially shorter than 2.5.46-mm1 (both include preempt).
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 474.1 15 36 10 6.64
2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 6.90
2.5.46 [1] 600.5 13 48 12 8.41
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 134.3 58 6 8 1.88
2.5.47 [3] 165.9 46 9 9 2.32
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 126.3 61 5 8 1.77
Very nice. Further improvement in 2.5.47-mm1 (note the big change in 2.5.46-47
is consistent with the preempt addition as mentioned in a previous thread)
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 102.3 70 6 3 1.43
2.4.19 [2] 134.1 54 14 5 1.88
2.5.46 [1] 103.5 75 7 4 1.45
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 103.2 74 6 4 1.45
2.5.47 [3] 103.4 74 6 4 1.45
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 100.6 76 7 4 1.41
The improvement in 2.5.47-mm1 although small is actually statistically significant.
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 90.2 76 1 17 1.26
2.4.19 [1] 89.8 77 1 20 1.26
2.5.46 [1] 96.8 74 2 22 1.36
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 101.4 70 1 22 1.42
2.5.47 [3] 100.2 71 1 20 1.40
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 102.4 69 1 19 1.43
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 103.3 70 32 3 1.45
2.4.19 [3] 100.0 72 33 3 1.40
2.5.46 [3] 148.0 51 34 2 2.07
2.5.46-mm1 [5] 180.5 41 35 1 2.53
2.5.47 [3] 151.1 49 35 2 2.12
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 127.0 58 29 2 1.78
Again very nice.
I refuse to speculate on what part of the kernel is responsible for these
changes, but to me the -mm1 results are encouraging to say the least.
Well done.
Con
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-11 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-11 23:31 Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-11-12 0:09 ` [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest Andrew Morton
2002-11-12 1:51 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 2:07 ` mark walters
2002-11-12 2:18 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 8:52 ` Giuliano Pochini
2002-11-12 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-12 9:40 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 3:04 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-11-12 11:04 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-12 14:20 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-11-12 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-12 20:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-12 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-20 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-21 0:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-21 1:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-21 6:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-21 13:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 17:21 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-21 17:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-21 18:18 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 18:25 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-21 14:00 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 19:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1037057498.3dd03dda5a8b9@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox