From: Luca Barbieri <ldb@ldb.ods.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.47-C0
Date: 18 Nov 2002 09:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1037608147.1774.45.camel@ldb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211181026090.29168-100000@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]
> problem Ulrich mentioned - it splits up ->user_tid into ->set_child_tid
> and ->clear_child_tid pointers. This way the clearing and setting
> functionality is cleanly separated.
How about making ->set_child_tid a parameter for schedule_tail, or even
directly using it in the ret_from_fork assembly?
It doesn't make much sense to have a variable in task_struct which is
used only at task creation.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3DD7E3E7.6040403@redhat.com>
2002-11-17 18:54 ` [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3 Linus Torvalds
2002-11-17 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 19:54 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:16 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 21:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-17 20:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-17 20:49 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 22:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-17 23:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 1:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 3:33 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 3:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 3:58 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 4:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 4:31 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 6:46 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 8:07 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 8:21 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 8:27 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 9:30 ` [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.47-C0 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 8:29 ` Luca Barbieri [this message]
2002-11-18 12:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 12:11 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-20 1:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-20 3:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 4:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 21:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 22:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 23:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 23:28 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-21 0:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-21 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-21 12:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-21 0:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-20 9:51 ` [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-A1 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-20 8:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 20:20 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-21 18:03 ` [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-C0 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-21 19:30 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 8:30 ` [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3 Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 12:50 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 12:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 13:20 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-18 13:03 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 1:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-18 3:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 22:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-17 23:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1037608147.1774.45.camel@ldb \
--to=ldb@ldb.ods.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox