Re: [lkcd-general] Re: What's left over.

Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03T03:04:44Z

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:24:17PM -0800, Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> P.S. IBM shouldn't have signed a contact with Red Hat without
> requiring certain features in Red Hat's OS(es). Pushing for
> LKCD, kprobes, LTT, etc., wouldn't be on this list for a whole
> variety of cases if that had been done in the first place.

Bah, it's enough that IBMs money totally fucked up the tree of one popular
distribution..