Re: [PATCH] deprecate use of bdflush()

[Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>]

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:11, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Ho-hum.  I was going to do this months ago but general exhaustion
> and sluggishness won out.
> 
> We should tell the user which process called sys_bdflush() to aid
> their expunging efforts.

Good idea.

I could do without the rate limiting, though - the print is after the
CAP_SYS_ADMIN check.  Root has plenty of other ways to print crap to the
screen and it saves 32-bits from bss.  But, uh, not a big deal at all
either way.

	Robert Love

 fs/buffer.c |    7 +++++++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+)


diff -urN linux-2.5.49-mm2/fs/buffer.c linux/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.5.49-mm2/fs/buffer.c	2002-12-02 16:07:53.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/fs/buffer.c	2002-12-02 17:24:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -2757,11 +2757,18 @@
 /*
  * There are no bdflush tunables left.  But distributions are
  * still running obsolete flush daemons, so we terminate them here.
+ *
+ * Use of bdflush() is deprecated and will be removed in a future kernel.
+ * The `pdflush' kernel threads fully replace bdflush daemons and this call.
  */
 asmlinkage long sys_bdflush(int func, long data)
 {
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
+
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "warning: process `%s' used the deprecated bdflush"
+			    " system call. Fix your initscripts?\n",
+			    current->comm);
 	if (func == 1)
 		do_exit(0);
 	return 0;