From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
marcelo@connectiva.com.br,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4
Date: 02 Dec 2002 17:41:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1038868912.869.60.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021202223800.A24773@infradead.org>
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:47:28PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Ingo vetoed it.
> >
> > I wasnt aware Ingo had a veto
>
> It's not exactly considered nice to merge code against the intention
> of it's author. (which doesn't mean it's impossible, of course)
Ingo did explicitly mention he thought the O(1) scheduler was not 2.4
material. Whether this has changed, e.g. due to stabilization of the
scheduler, I do not know. But I do recall he had an opinion in the
past.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-02 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 0:26 [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4 Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-02 18:57 ` Robert Love
2002-12-03 0:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:50 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-02 18:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-12-02 19:12 ` Robert Love
2002-12-02 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-02 19:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-03 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-03 21:09 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-04 0:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 0:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-04 0:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 1:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-04 9:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-04 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-04 1:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 2:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-06 18:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-08 13:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-12-08 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-09 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-12-03 1:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 18:59 ` Robert Love
2002-12-02 22:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-02 22:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 22:41 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-12-07 16:55 ` bill davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-13 23:08 Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-13 21:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-12-14 4:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-09 20:19 kernel
2002-12-09 3:02 Jim Houston
2002-10-01 23:03 Robert Love
2002-10-02 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-02 15:00 ` Robert Love
2002-11-05 3:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-06 15:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-11-07 21:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:12 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-03 0:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:47 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-02 19:10 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1038868912.869.60.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@connectiva.com.br \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox