From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>
Cc: "'Till Immanuel Patzschke'" <tip@inw.de>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
Date: 18 Dec 2002 20:13:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1040260387.855.95.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A46BBDB345A7D5118EC90002A5072C7806CACA2C@orsmsx116.jf.intel.com>
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 20:04, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> >
> > forgot the kernel version (2.4.20aa1)...
>
> You need the O(1) scheduler; not sure if aa has it or not; if not, lots of
> processes will suck your machine. I think -ac has the O(1) scheduler, or try
> 2.5. The old scheduler is pretty cool but not as scalable as the new one.
>
> If it has it ... well, I have no idea - maybe Robert Love would
> know.
2.4-aa has the O(1) scheduler, yes.
I think 15,000 processes may always suck, though :)
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 1:04 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2002-12-19 1:13 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-12-19 2:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-19 1:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-19 2:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-19 0:46 Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 0:53 ` Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 1:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:12 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:20 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 1:44 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 0:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-19 1:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 14:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1040260387.855.95.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tip@inw.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox