RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!

Rik van Riel
2002-12-19T01:50:37Z

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> He's running the -aa kernel, which has all the right bits for this too.
> In fact in some ways for very large memory boxes its probably the better
> variant

If you're willing to merge a patch to take -ac up to rmap15b
I'll integrate some large memory stuff into my tree for 15c
and 2.4-ac should be able to handle large boxes too within a
month or so.

(keeping the speed of merging slow, deliberately)

regards,

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com