public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ?
Date: 11 Jan 2003 07:26:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042266405.14440.54.camel@sun> (raw)

Hi!

I really do wonder whether the displayed message is wrong or why it
always chooses the slowest checksumming function (happens with 2.4.19 -
21pre3)

2.4.20:
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: raid5: measuring checksumming speed
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: 8regs     :  3054.400 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: 32regs    :  2696.800 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: pIII_sse  :  1614.000 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: pII_mmx   :  4672.000 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: p5_mmx    :  5984.000 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (1614.000 MB/sec)

21pre2:
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: raid5: measuring checksumming speed
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: 8regs     :  3054.000 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: 32regs    :  2697.200 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: pIII_sse  :  2574.000 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: pII_mmx   :  4671.600 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: p5_mmx    :  5984.000 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (2574.000 MB/sec)
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27


21pre3:
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: raid5: measuring checksumming speed
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: 8regs     :  3055.200 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: 32regs    :  2697.200 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: pIII_sse  :  5658.400 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: pII_mmx   :  4672.400 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: p5_mmx    :  5984.800 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (5658.400 MB/sec)

it is always the same system...athlon xp2.4+...
Soeren.


             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-11  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-11  6:26 Soeren Sonnenburg [this message]
2003-01-11 15:45 ` choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ? Lionel Bouton
2003-01-11 19:39   ` Rene Rebe
2003-01-11 19:52     ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2003-01-11 20:20       ` Rene Rebe
2003-01-12 14:44         ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-01-12 16:14           ` Rene Rebe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1042266405.14440.54.camel@sun \
    --to=kernel@nn7.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox