From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:18:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:18:10 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:20747 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:18:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support From: Robert Love To: Luuk van der Duim Cc: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1042406417.8427.9.camel@cc75757-a.groni1.gr.home.nl> References: <1042402432.834.70.camel@phantasy> <1042406417.8427.9.camel@cc75757-a.groni1.gr.home.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1042403214.834.82.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 12 Jan 2003 15:26:55 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:20, Luuk van der Duim wrote: > Aren't those called Willamette based Celerons? The current ones are, but future ones will surely be based on future cores (i.e. I suspect we will see Northwood-based Celerons, soon) and this option will be applicable to those, too. More importantly, the consumer name is just "Celeron" i.e. the box does not mention the core or anything. The best I think we can offer is "P4-based Celeron" which is a nice blanket name. Robert Love