From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 06:47:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 06:47:06 -0500 Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.26]:53838 "EHLO amsfep16-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 06:47:05 -0500 Subject: Re: Permission to use atomic code under LGPL From: Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1043776362.2939.14.camel@thebox> References: <1043776362.2939.14.camel@thebox> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1044014183.1127.13.camel@thebox> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 31 Jan 2003 12:56:24 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I got no objections to my request to use these few lines under the LGPL so I will now update our sourcefile to make sure linus gets copyright and origin is informed of. Thanks a lot guys! Christian On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 18:52, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote: > Hi, > I am with the GStreamer project (www.gstreamer.net). We did a small > license audit the other day and discovered we included some code from > the kernel. GStreamer uses the LGPL so this is a problem for us. > > The code in question is the atomic code and is included in our > sourcefile below. Do the person(s) in question responsible for this code > mind if we re-license it under the LGPL? > > We will of course add comments in the code stating its origin with > copyrights etc. > > I am not subscribed to the list so if anyone has objections to this > relicensing of this particular piece of code, please CC me any > responses. > > Sincerely, > Christian -- Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller