From: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Matt Reppert <arashi@arashi.yi.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU throttling??
Date: 04 Feb 2003 15:34:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1044369243.24397.12.camel@sonja> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200302031924.h13JO9a0026095@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]
Am Mon, 2003-02-03 um 20.24 schrieb Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu:
> I knew that. The question I asked was whether halted at 700Mhz takes more
> power than halted at 400Mhz...
PowerPC CPUs will shut down unneeded units. There's no such things as a
"hlt" instruction. The natural way to slow down the CPU causing more
sparetime to shut down single units is to throttle the dispatching of
instructions for which there's are flags in the control register set.
I've no idea where the frequency scaling should happen but it either
needs some hardware clock control or it's the mentioned dispatch
throttling. In case of the former there'd be some powersave effects
because the power drawn by a CPU is direct proportional to the
frequency. In the latter case the difference between an automatically
sleeping 700Mhz and a throttled 700Mhz cpu at "400Mhz" should be pretty
small, in case the cpu is mostly idle.
--
Servus,
Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-04 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-03 15:47 Joeri Belis
2003-02-03 16:55 ` CPU throttling?? Seamus
2003-02-03 17:00 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-03 17:04 ` Martin Hermanowski
2003-02-03 17:13 ` John Bradford
2003-02-03 18:57 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-02-03 19:02 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-03 19:09 ` Martin Hermanowski
2003-02-03 19:20 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 14:12 ` Erik Mouw
2003-02-03 19:14 ` Matt Reppert
2003-02-03 19:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-02-04 14:34 ` Daniel Egger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-03 21:14 Grover, Andrew
2003-02-03 21:18 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-03 21:41 ` John Bradford
2003-02-03 22:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-02-03 22:31 ` Ville Herva
2003-02-04 10:22 ` Seamus
2003-02-04 10:31 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 11:01 ` Seamus
2003-02-03 21:51 Grover, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1044369243.24397.12.camel@sonja \
--to=degger@fhm.edu \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=arashi@arashi.yi.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox