From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (afs)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:51:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046.1258649516@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091119080947.GD5922@localhost>
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> Will you pick up this updated patch? It also removes the unused bdi.
Sure - but it might be in a week and a bit. I'm scrambling to get stuff done
before going on holiday next week.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-18 8:26 [PATCH 00/12] trivial writeback cleanups/fixes Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 01/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (write_cache_pages) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (pohmelfs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19 8:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19 11:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-11-20 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-21 11:23 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (afs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19 8:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19 16:51 ` David Howells [this message]
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (cifs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (gfs2) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 9:59 ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-11-18 10:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 11:13 ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (xfs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-19 8:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-20 7:24 ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] ext4: remove encountered_congestion trace Wu Fengguang
2009-11-24 16:18 ` tytso
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] ext4: remove unused parameter wbc from __ext4_journalled_writepage() Wu Fengguang
2009-11-24 16:18 ` tytso
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] writeback: remove the always false bdi_cap_writeback_dirty() test Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] writeback: introduce wbc.for_background Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 8:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] bdi: use bdi_stat_sum() for more accurate debugfs stats Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1046.1258649516@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox