public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, viro@math.psu.edu
Subject: lockmeter results comparing 2.4.17, 2.5.3, and 2.5.5
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:19:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10460000.1014833979@w-hlinder.des> (raw)


	Congratulations to everyone working to reduce contention of the
Big Kernel Lock. According to this benchmark your work has paid off!
John Hawkes of SGI asked me to Beta test his 2.5.5 version of lockmeter 
last night (that's what I get for asking when it would be out). The results 
were interesting enough to post. 
	All three runs were on an 8-way SMP system running dbench with 
up to 16 clients 10 times each. The results are at http://lse.sf.net/locking . 
Throughput numbers are not included yet, I need to rerun dbench without 
lockmeter to get accurate throughput results.
	
(Read down the Con(tention) column)
TOTAL is for the whole system
kernel_flag is for every function holding BKL combined.


SPINLOCKS         HOLD            WAIT
  UTIL  CON    MEAN(  MAX )   MEAN(  MAX )(% CPU)     TOTAL NOWAIT SPIN RJECT  NAME

2.4.17:

       13.7%  2.2us(  43ms)   31us(  43ms)(20.0%) 232292367 86.3% 13.7% 0.00%  *TOTAL*

 33.9% 40.3%   11us(  43ms)   51us(  43ms)( 8.2%)  19725127 59.7% 40.3%    0%  kernel_flag


2.5.3:
       11.1%  1.0us(  21ms)  8.2us(  18ms)( 3.8%) 738953957 88.9% 11.1% 0.00%  *TOTAL*

 10.4% 22.6%  8.3us(  21ms)   23us(  18ms)(0.81%)  27982565 77.4% 22.6%    0%  kernel_flag


2.5.5: 

       8.6%  1.6us( 100ms)   30us(  86ms)( 9.4%) 783373441 91.4%  8.6% 0.00%  *TOTAL*

 1.2% 0.33%  2.5us(  50ms) 1167us(  43ms)(0.23%)  12793605 99.7% 0.33%    0%  kernel_flag



Hanna Linder
IBM Linux Technology Center
hannal@us.ibm.com


             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-27 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-27 18:19 Hanna Linder [this message]
2002-02-27 18:34 ` [Lse-tech] lockmeter results comparing 2.4.17, 2.5.3, and 2.5.5 Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27 19:27   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-27 19:45   ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-27 19:57     ` Hanna Linder
2002-02-28  8:31       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2002-02-27 20:01     ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27 20:15       ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-27 21:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-27 21:48     ` Alexander Viro
2002-02-27 23:14       ` Hanna Linder
2002-02-27 23:32       ` Hanna Linder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10460000.1014833979@w-hlinder.des \
    --to=hannal@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox