From: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: 25 Feb 2003 23:33:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046233990.1111.45.camel@cube> (raw)
Jean Tourrilhes writes:
> It looks like a compiler bug to me...
> Some users have complained that when the following
> code is compiled without the -fno-strict-aliasing,
> the order of the write and memcpy is inverted (which
> mean a bogus len is mem-copied into the stream).
> Code (from linux/include/net/iw_handler.h) :
> --------------------------------------------
> static inline char *
> iwe_stream_add_event(char * stream, /* Stream of events */
> char * ends, /* End of stream */
> struct iw_event *iwe, /* Payload */
> int event_len) /* Real size of payload */
> {
> /* Check if it's possible */
> if((stream + event_len) < ends) {
> iwe->len = event_len;
> memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
> stream += event_len;
> } return stream;
> }
> --------------------------------------------
> IMHO, the compiler should have enough context to
> know that the reordering is dangerous. Any suggestion
> to make this simple code more bullet proof is welcomed.
>
> Have fun...
Since (char*) is special, I agree that it's a bug.
In any case, a warning sure would be nice!
Now for the fun. Pass iwe->len into this
macro before the memcpy, and all should be well.
#define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) asm volatile(""::"r"(&(x)))
Like this:
iwe->len = event_len;
FORCE_TO_MEM(iwe->len);
memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-26 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-26 4:33 Albert Cahalan [this message]
2003-02-26 17:20 ` Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 18:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 19:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 20:19 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 21:30 ` Albert Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 23:46 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 15:38 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 16:04 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-02-26 20:47 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 20:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 22:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-27 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 19:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 23:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-01 8:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-26 17:22 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 21:07 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-27 4:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-26 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1046233990.1111.45.camel@cube \
--to=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox