public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: 25 Feb 2003 23:33:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046233990.1111.45.camel@cube> (raw)

Jean Tourrilhes writes:

> It looks like a compiler bug to me...
> Some users have complained that when the following
> code is compiled without the -fno-strict-aliasing,
> the order of the write and memcpy is inverted (which
> mean a bogus len is mem-copied into the stream).
> Code (from linux/include/net/iw_handler.h) :
> --------------------------------------------
> static inline char *
> iwe_stream_add_event(char * stream,  /* Stream of events */
>        char * ends,  /* End of stream */
>        struct iw_event *iwe, /* Payload */
>        int event_len) /* Real size of payload */
> {
>  /* Check if it's possible */
>  if((stream + event_len) < ends) {
>   iwe->len = event_len;
>   memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
>   stream += event_len;
>  } return stream;
> }
> --------------------------------------------
> IMHO, the compiler should have enough context to
> know that the reordering is dangerous. Any suggestion
> to make this simple code more bullet proof is welcomed.
>
> Have fun...

Since (char*) is special, I agree that it's a bug.
In any case, a warning sure would be nice!

Now for the fun. Pass iwe->len into this
macro before the memcpy, and all should be well.

#define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) asm volatile(""::"r"(&(x)))

Like this:

   iwe->len = event_len;
   FORCE_TO_MEM(iwe->len);
   memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);



             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-26  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-26  4:33 Albert Cahalan [this message]
2003-02-26 17:20 ` Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 18:23   ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:22     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 19:40       ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:42         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 20:19           ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 21:30             ` Albert Cahalan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 23:46 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 15:38 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 16:04   ` Falk Hueffner
2003-02-26 20:47     ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 20:57       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 22:22         ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-27 19:30           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 19:45             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:00               ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 20:35                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:38                   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 23:55                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-01  8:29                     ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-26 17:22   ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 21:07     ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-27  4:41       ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-26 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1046233990.1111.45.camel@cube \
    --to=albert@users.sf.net \
    --cc=jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox